Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 00:52

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What’s next?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Scientists May Have Just Discovered the First Ever Pieces of Mercury - The Daily Galaxy
Just in the last 5 years:
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
United Airlines Flight Attendants Lose Legal Battle Over ‘Reprehensible’ Sickness Policy - PYOK
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
If you could instantly cancel one social norm, what would it be?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
World-First: Scientists Capture a Rare Lightning-Triggered Gamma-Ray Burst - SciTechDaily
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What's a band that is really popular that you don't like? Why?